One Day In The Life

INTRODUCTION

BY MARVIN L. KALB


On November 20, 1962, _Novy Mir_, a monthly Soviet literary magazine, published a short novel by an unknown Russian writer, Alexander Isayevich Solzhenitsyn, entitled _One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich_. It was an immediate literary and political sensation. Within a day all of the ninety-flve thousand copies of the November issue of the magazine were snapped up by eager Russians. Within a week Solzhenitsyn skyrocketed to international fame from an obscure job teaching mathematics in Ryazan, a small provincial town not too far from Moscow; and his title character, Ivan Denisovich Shukhov, was quickly recognized throughout the country as a touching symbol of the suffering which the Russian people had endured under the Stalinist system.
Was there anything special about Ivan that sparked this lightning response? Not really. Ivan was an ordinary Russian caught up in the swirl and chaos of World War II. Like millions of other Russians, he served uncomplainingly in the Red Army for four years, surviving the bitter cold and hunger of the Western front. In 1945, he and a friend were captured by the Germans. After a few days they managed to escape and returned to Russian lines. Ironically, instead of being decorated for heroism and loyalty, Ivan was arrested by Stalin's supersensitive secret police, who accused him of high treason and charged that he had returned only to spy for the Germans. Confused and helpless, afraid that he would be shot if he tried to explain, Ivan "confessed." He was sentenced to ten years in a Siberian concentration camp. Solzhenitsyn's book describes one day in that camp, one day no better and no worse than any of the other three thousand six hundred and fifty-two days of Ivan's sentence. Ivan's experience was no isolated miscarriage of justice; it was typical of the Stalinist system, under which the labor camps of Siberia were crowded with Russians whose "crime" may have been nothing greater than a careless remark about Stalin to a tattletale neighbor. There is hardly a Russian family today that managed to escape this tragic fate. Almost every one of them had a father or a husband or a son or a cousin who "sat"--the Russian euphemism for serving a term, generally unwarranted, in the camps. That is why _One Day_, the first book about this black page of the Stalin era ever to appear in the Soviet Union, has such a profound Impact on the Russian people. By its brevity and simple power, it forces a Russian reader to remember the days of Stalin.
Many Russians do not want to remember: the victims of Stalinist injustice find it too painful; and the accomplices find it too shattering--especially now, after several years of relative normalcy. But there are others--Khrushchev among them--who want Russia to remember. Although Solzhenitsyn is undoubtedly a writer with bold views, it is important to note that his novel was published at this time because it suited Khrushchev's domestic policy. Its unstated but obvious message--the devastating impact of Stalinism on ordinary Russians--fits neatly into the pattern of Khrushchev's continuing attack against Stalin's abuses.
Solzhenitsyn finished his book about eighteen months ago. The manuscript was sent to several magazines and was rejected by all of them; apparently the editors found its theme too explosive to handle on their own authority. At last, the manuscript fell into the hands of the "liberal wing" of the Soviet literary world, represented by such writers as, among others, Alexander Tvardovsky, editor of _Novy Mir_.
They felt strongly that _One Day_ should be published, but they too were unable to make such a decision on their own. They turned to the Central Committee of the Cornmunist Party for a decision. The members of the Central Committee debated the merits of publication; they were sharply divided. The final decision, as usual, was made by Premier Khrushchev, who is said to have read the book and personally approved its uncensored publication.. In a stillunpublished speech before a major Central Committee meeting which took place the week the book came out, Khrushchev revealed his own role in the decision to publish it. An additional five thousand copies were made available to the top Communists attending the meeting.
At the same time, government publications launched a co-ordinated campaign to give the novel maximum publicity: _Soviet Literature_ translated it into English; _Moscow News_, a weekly newspaper for foreign consumption, was authorized to run a serialized version; and _Izvestia_ and other non-literary newspapers published highly favorable reviews of the book.
Even without this official encouragement, the book would have been a sensation in Russia--not only because of its sensitive subject but also because of its literary merit. _One Day_ represents no literary innovation. Its form and style are conventional, following the nineteenth-century Russian tradition of the "social protest" novel. But it tells a story about little people trapped in a merciless political machine in a way that lifts it high above the level of the average Soviet "man-loves-tractor" school of literature.
Solzhenitsyn's language is direct and powerful, reminding some Russian critics of the young Dostoevsky, who, in his _Notes from Underground_, managed to convey a unique impressiOn of nineteenth-century Russia through the eyes and thoughts of a man holed up in a basement. Using this same effective literary device--seeing and understanding the world through the eyes and mind of the leading character--Solzhenitsyn presents an unadorned and starkly disturbing picture of life in a Russian concentration camp. He traces one day in Ivan's life, from reveille to lights-out. He never intrudes in Ivan's story, and the reader quickly identifies with Ivan the man and Ivan the prisoner.
One chills to the 17°-below-zero cold of Siberia. One sympathizes with the poor peasant who wants to go home but is afraid even to think about it. One grasps the meaning of Ivan's sad, wise question: "How can you expect a man who's warm to understand a man who's cold?" One understands why Ivan has become indifferent, and cannot even write a letter home. "Writing now was like dropping stones in some deep, bottomless pool. They drop; they sink--but there is no answer." One even understands why Ivan signed a confession saying be had returned to Russian lines "to carry out a mission for German intelligence." And one begins to comprehend the simple, futile, and monotonous horror of the labor-camp system as one reads the last few lines of the book:
"Shukhov went to sleep fully content. He'd had many strokes of luck that day: they hadn't put him in the cells; they hadn't sent his squad to the settlement; he'd swiped a bowl of kasha at dinner; he'd built a wall and enjoyed doing it; he'd smuggled a bit of hacksaw blade through; he'd earned a favor from Tsezar that evening; he'd bought that tobacco. And he hadn't fallen ill. He'd got over it.
"A day without a dark cloud. Almost a happy day.
"There were three thousand six hundred and fifty-three days like that in his stretch. From the first clang of the rail to the last clang of the rail.
"Three thousand six hundred and fifty-three days.
"The three extra days were for leap years."
Solzhenitsyn conveys the power and drama of prison life in a style marked by understatement. His economy of words is not a Slavic quality. Yet Solzhenitsyn is a Slav. He has been reluctant to give interviews to local or foreign reporters, so most of the available information about his life comes from an officially sanctioned one-page biography, released by Tass, the official Soviet news agency, after numerous requests for information.
Solzhenitsyn was born in 1918, a year after the Bolsheviks stormed to power throughout Russia. Although his novel draws on his own experiences, it is not strictly autobiographical; for Solzhenitsyn, unlike his simple peasant hero, came from a "petit-bourgeois" family. When he was a boy, his father died; and he was brought up by his mother in the southern city of Rostov. He completed his ten-year school and enrolled at the University of Rostov, where he majored in physics and mathematics. The biographical note states that he "made no special study of literature until he was twenty-one and took a correspondence course at the Philological Department of Moscow University."
In 1941, his life, and Russia's, changed drastically. The Germans invaded Russia, and Solzhenitsyn, a spare man with dark, intense eyes and a brooding, lined face, was drafted into the Red Army. In 1942, he took an artillery course and became commander of an artillery battery, where he served with distinction for three years. He was twice decorated for bravery.
In February 1945, he was arrested in East Prussia on what Tass calls a "baseless political charge" and sentenced to eight years' imprisonment. According to one story, Solzhenitsyn was supposed to have made a derogatory remark about Stalin. For the next eight years, he was in a Russian concentration camp--probably Karaganda, according to unofficial reports--where he survived the experiences he later described in _One Day_. In 1953, after the death of Stalin, he was released from the camp but was still forced to live in exile in Central Asia, where he remained until after Khrushchev's historic "secret speech" denouncing Stalin at the 20th Party Congress in Febmary 1956.
Solzhenitsyn was "rehabilitated" in 1957 "in the absence of corpus delicti." He moved to Ryazan, married a chemistry student, and began to teach mathematics at the local ten-year school. In his spare time, he started to write, drawing on his own experiences and observations of people in a small Russian town. _One Day_ is his first published work.
It is a popular sensation because its subject is meaningful for every Soviet citizen; it awakens deeply buried memories and touches deep chords of guilt and despair.
It is a literary sensation because of its simple power, its ability to envelop the reader in the futile atmosphere of camp life and to make him see it through the lives of a Russian peasant who accepts everything, both good and evil, with enduring patience as he has done for centuries under every conceivable kind of misrule.
It is an official sensation because it humanizes the cold cliches of Khrushchev's attacks on Stalinist "violations of socialist legality," and makes his drive to eliminate these abuses more comprehensible to the average Russian.
But beyond all this, _One Day_ raises a major question: how far has Khrushchev stretched the limits of what can and cannot be said in print? Although this is a bold and original book, could it have been bolder if the system had not held it back? There are old Bolsheviks here who, while praising _One Day_, point out that there was more to the labor-camp story than fatalistic acceptance. The innocent Ivans, unprotesting and mild, were the majority; but there were others, more politically sophisticated, who refused to accept the injustices of the system which had sent them, guiltless, into the labor camps, and who refused to cooperate in any way with the authorities.
Unlike Ivan, they took no simple pride in getting through another day and building a fine wail. They planned and occasionally tried to carry out revolts. They called themselves the Blacks; they called the Ivans the Reds.
Solzhenitsyn writes nothing about these people, the old Bolsheviks complain. Perhaps Solzhenitsyn did not know them. Perhaps his experience was limited to Ivans. Perhaps he knew of the others but considered them irrelevant to his story of the typical suffering Russian peasant. Or, per. haps, he would have written more, but could not because of the limits of present-day Soviet literary policy.
It is difficult to imagine Khrushchev endorsing a different kind of literary sensation--for example, one in which the main character openly denounces the Communist Party itself, rather than Stalin, for the evils of the labor camps. It is certainly a step toward internal liberalization when a cutting attack such as Solzhenitsyn's can be published in Moscow; but Russia still has a long way to go before _Doctor Zhivagos_ can be published and freely discussed.

Moscow
December 1962